USPTO serial 74660436
COHERENT ACOUSTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COHERENT ACOUSTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard S. Koppel
RICHARD S KOPPEL KOPPEL & JACOBS31255 CEDAR VALLEY DR STE 302WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91362-4031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | digital sound equipment and media, namely compact disks prerecorded with music or video sound tracks; compact disk recorders; compact disk players; digital audio tapes prerecorded with music; digital audio tape recorders; digital audio tape players; digital video disks prerecorded with music and video sound tracks; digital video disk recorders; digital video disk players; satellite digital audio transmitters; satellite digital audio receivers; cable digital audio receivers; cable digital audio transmitters; digital audio workstations, namely, digital audio encoders, digital audio decoders and drives for digital audio media; digital sound, video and background audio systems, namely, combinations of (1) compact disk player, digital audio tape player, digital video disk player, laser disk player, radio receiver, television receiver, cable video receiver, satellite video receiver, digital compact cassette player, mini disk player, digital video tape precorded with music or video sound tracks, computer hard disk or video projector, (2) pre-amplifier, audio/video receiver, digital audio decoder, digital audio processor or sound effects processor, (3) audio equalizer, (4) audio amplifier and (5) audio speakers; digital compact cassettes prerecorded with music; digital audio recording systems, namely, combinations of (1) compact disk recorder, digital audio tape recorder, digital video disk recorder, digital compact disk recorder, digital multi-track audio recorder, hard disk recorder for computers or mini disk recorder, (2) microphone, (3) microphone amplifier, (4) analog-to-digital converter and (5) bit-rate reduction encoder; digital audio mixing systems, namely computer-based hard disk audio editors and mixers, digital audio mixing consoles; digital audio processors; audio broadcast transmitters; audio broadcast receivers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |