USPTO serial 74660887
DUAL ACTION PILLOW FOR LOWER BACK PAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 22, 1997
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUAL ACTION PILLOW FOR LOWER BACK PAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Grand Rapids, MI
Grand Rapids, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Duby, Jr.
JAMES R DUBY JR SMITH, HAUGHEY, RICE & ROEGGE1301 N HAGADORN RDE LANSING, MI 48823UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | orthopedic pillows | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 5, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2004 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |