USPTO serial 74661095
DATASAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 25, 1997
- Examiner
- RITCHY, MICHELLE M.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DATASAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NURNBERG, DE
D-90478 Nurnberg, DE
D-90478 Nurnberg, DE
D-90478 Nurnberg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neal S. Greenfield
NEAL S GREENFIELD SCULLY, SCOTT, MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLZGARDEN CITY, NY 11530-0299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | protective housings for electronic components, especially plug-in electronic components for personal computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIEL SHIFTUNG & CO
- Other trademarks owned by Diehl GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Diehl GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Diehl GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DATASAFE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 31, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |