USPTO serial 74661806
GEORGIA LOVES YOU TO PEACHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAMILTON, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GEORGIA LOVES YOU TO PEACHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Pensacola, FL
Pensacola, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig L. Mytelka
CRAIG L MYTELKA CLARK & STANT, PCONE COLUMBUS CTRVIRGINIA BEACH, VA 23462UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting tourism and cultural opportunities in the state of Georgia by the preparation and dissemination of advertising matter related thereto | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Holmer Smith, Margaret Elizabeth Bragg Smith, Deborah Kay Sasser and Elsie Elaine Roberts Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Robert Holmer Smith, Margaret Elizabeth Bragg Smith, Deborah Kay Sasser and Elsie Elaine Roberts Partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named GEORGIA LOVES YOU TO PEACHES
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 1, 1997 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |