USPTO serial 74661904
KALTEX HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 30, 2001
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KALTEX HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Naucalpan De Juarez, MX
Naucalpan De Juarez, MX
Naucalpan De Juarez, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN B. FLOHR
SUSAN B. FLOHR Blank Rome LLP1825 Eye Street NWWashington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | textile articles comprising home furnishings for bed, bath and kitchen, namely, sheets; comforters; blankets; bedspreads; drapes; napery, namely, tablecloths, napkins, placemats; towels; bathroom textiles, namely, bath mats and shower curtains; and textile wall hangings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO KALTEX, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO KALTEX, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by GRUPO KALTEX, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named KALTEX HOME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 30, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 31, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 20, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |