USPTO serial 74661908
PET-PROOF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PET-PROOF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Kondracki
EDWARD J KONDRACKI KERKAM, STOWELL, KONDRACKI & CLARKE, PCTWO SKYLINE PL STE 6005203 LEESBURG PIKEFALLS CHURCH, VA 22041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | textile carpet | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |