USPTO serial 74662011
TOTAL THE DAILY SAVINGS CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOTAL THE DAILY SAVINGS CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robyn Nordin Stowell
ROBYN NORDIN STOWELL MORRISON & HECKER LLP2800 N CENTRAL AVE STE 1600PHOENIX, AZ 85004-1047UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | discount-card services and advertising, promotion and marketing of products and services | ABANDONED | May 4, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1997 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |