USPTO serial 74662540
MEDNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gaithersburg, MD
Gaithersburg, MD
GAITHSBURG, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. Ryan
JOHN W RYAN IGEN, INC16020 INDUSTRIAL DRGAITHERSBURG, MD 20877UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer software consulting and support services for scientific instrumentation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2001 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 5, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2001 | EX5M | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2001 | EX5D | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 20, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |