Drawing for ORIOS

USPTO serial 74662541

ORIOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRIEGEL, ADAM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORIOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Ryan

JOHN W RYAN IGEN, INC16020 INDUSTRIAL DRGAITHERSBURG, MD 20877UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use with electrochemiluminescent analyzers in diagnostic and research analysis of samples in solutionABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 22, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 20, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 14, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 8, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 11, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 26, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance