USPTO serial 74662732
DUESENBERG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUESENBERG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
73054 Eislingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond C. Stewart
RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH8110 GATEHOUSE RDSTE 500 EFALLS CHURCH, VA 22042Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, pants, shorts, sweaters, rain wear, sweatshirts, polo shirts, caps, hats, blouses, skirts, scarves and belts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |