USPTO serial 74662739
FARGO AND CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARGO AND CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
SANTA BARBARA, CA
SANTA BARBARA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles S. Tigerman
MICHAEL D HARRIS OPPENHEIMER POMS SMITH2029 CENTURY PARK ESTE 3800LOS ANGELES, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and women's casual clothing, namely, jean trousers, jean shirts, jean shorts | ACTIVE | May 19, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |