USPTO serial 74663357
RECURSIVE SEQUENCING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RECURSIVE SEQUENCING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTINA T LARSON
MARTINA T LARSON OPPEDAHL & LARSONP O BOX 5270FRISCO, CO 80443-5270UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DNA sequencing reagents for scientific or research use | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | DNA sequencing reagents for clinical or medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | automated laboratory apparatus for determining DNA sequences, and computer software for processing NDA sequence information and producing reports thereof for use in medical diagnosis | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | medical molecular diagnostic services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Visible Genetics Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RECURSIVE SEQUENCING
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |