USPTO serial 74663596
HEARTY HANDFULS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEARTY HANDFULS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick C. Stephenson
PATRICK C STEPHENSONMCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ, PC1400 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZOMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | frozen foods, namely, mushrooms, chicken wings, breaded vegetables, grilled poultry, breaded poultry, breaded seafood, potato skins, cheesesticks, processed cheese snacks, processed fruit snacks, meatballs, calamari, artichokes, French fried potatoes and processed potato snacks | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | frozen foods, namely, sandwiches, hamburgers, cheeseburgers, club sandwiches, cheese sandwiches, grilled cheese sandwiches, ham and cheese sandwiches, BLT sandwiches, roast beef sandwiches, fish sandwiches, tuna sandwiches, tuna salad sandwiches, ham sandwiches, steak sandwiches, beef steak sandwiches, reuben sandwiches; chicken sandwiches, turkey sandwiches, hot dogs, chili dogs, corned beef sandwiches, barbecued beef sandwiches, barbecued pork sandwiches, barbecued turkey sandwiches; meatball sandwiches, egg salad sandwiches, sausage sandwiches, vegetarian sandwiches, seafood salad sandwiches, hero sandwiches, submarine sandwiches, pizza-flavored sandwiches, croissant sandwiches, bagel sandwiches, pita sandwiches, calzones, topped French bread, open-faced sandwiches, bite-sized pizza snacks, pizza, pizza slices, egg rolls, nachos, antipasto, burritos, tacos, fajitas, enchiladas, chimichangas, tostadas, rellenos, stuffed pasta, pies, cakes, doughnuts, pastries, muffins, croissants, rolls, bagels, pretzels, bagels with cheese filling, pretzels with cheese filling and baked dough with cheese filling | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |