USPTO serial 74664674
HUMMINGBIRD COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCINI, CYNTHIA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUMMINGBIRD COMMUNICATIONS LTD.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN FAIER
MARTIN FAIER FAIER & FAIER566 W ADAMS ST#600CHICAGO, IL 60661Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs used in, or as part of computer operating systems in a multi tasking, multi user operating system for controlling the execution of programs, and for computer resource allocation, program scheduling, input/output control and the management of data flow within the computer and/or network | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 4, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 16, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |