Drawing for VIRTUALWEATHER

USPTO serial 74664785

VIRTUALWEATHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIRTUALWEATHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arthur Schwartz

ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 500 3000 K ST N WP O BOX 25696WASHINGTON, DC 20007-8696

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042weather information services, namely, the creation and provision of simulated computer enhanced images of weather patterns for broadcast by othersACTIVEFeb 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 12, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 16, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 26, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 9, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance