USPTO serial 74665014
TIGHT SQUEEZE TOOTHPASTE SAVER LESS WASTE-MORE PASTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TIGHT SQUEEZE TOOTHPASTE SAVER LESS WASTE-MORE PASTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
London, Ontario, N6C 3S7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timmothy J. Sinnott
TIMMOTHY J SINNOTT BERESKIN & PARRSTE 4000 BOX 401SCOTIA PLZ 40 KING ST WTORONTO, ON M5H 3Y2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | nozzle attachable to a toothpaste tube for reducing the flow of toothpaste | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 17, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |