USPTO serial 74665018
A DELICIOUS MOMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A DELICIOUS MOMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A HUGHES
JOHN A HUGHES TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy products, namely, cheese, fluid milk, cream, yogurt and buttermilk | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | frozen confections and novelties, namely, water ices, ice cream, ice milk, ice cream mix, milk shake mix, frosted malt mix, yogurt mix, frozen yogurt, sherbet and milk-based frozen confections in novelty forms and/or shapes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |