USPTO serial 74666435
ARGLAES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 3, 2001
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARGLAES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ayr, KA8 8AA, GB
Ayr, KA8 8AA, GB
Ayr, KA8 8AA, GB
MANSFIELD, MA
MANSFIELD, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
N. Christopher Norton
N. Christopher Norton Arent Fox LLP1717 K Street, NWWashington, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | polymers for the slow release of silver ions used for wound treatment; antibacterial reagents for wound dressings; wound dressings and surgical dressings | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GILTECH LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GILTECH LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by GILTECH LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by COVIDIEN LP
- Other trademarks owned by KPR U.S., LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named ARGLAES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 6, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 17, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 16, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |