USPTO serial 74666592
BEYOND GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICH, NORMAN J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEYOND GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcella A. Stapor
MARCELLA A STAPOR LIDDY SULLIVAN GALWAY BEGLER & COHEN708 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | jam, fruit preserves, soups | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | bread, cookies, crackers, coffee, beverages, namely grain-based food beverages, herbal food beverages, chocolate food beverages not being dairy based or vegetable based and tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring; and condiments, namely mustard, mayonnaise, ketchup and relish | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by A.V. OLSSON TRADING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by A.V. OLSSON TRADING CO., INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BEYOND GOURMET
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |