USPTO serial 74666595
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
North Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin F. Majestic
ROBERT H BARRIGAR BARRIGAR & SOLICITORSSTE 830 OCEANIC PLZ1066 W HASTINGS STVANCOUVER, BC V6E 3X1| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software in the nature of a utility program for creating and appending screen notes | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 11, 1999 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |