Drawing for J. GARCIA

USPTO serial 74666784

J. GARCIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2645963Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 5, 2002
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with J. GARCIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brooke Oliver

BROOKE OLIVER OLIVER & SABEC P.C.50 Balmy AlleySan Francisco, CA 94110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys, namely, plush and stuffed toys, bath toys, bendable toys, crib toys, mechanical action toys, animal toys, plastic toys, namely, disc toss toys, flying discs, dolls and electronic toys, namely, electric action toys; games, namely, card games, board games, parlor games, action skill games, video games, namely, hand held units for playing video games and computer games, namely, stand alone interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software; and playthings, namely, play musical instrumentsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 30, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2009C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Feb 25, 2009CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 6, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 13, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2002R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 19, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Aug 12, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 13, 2002CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Dec 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2001SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 14, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 10, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 10, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 28, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 16, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 22, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 20, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 1, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 1, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 1, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance