USPTO serial 74667350
J. GARCIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with J. GARCIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN RAFAEL, CA
San Rafael, CA
SAN RAFAEL, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CARLA B. OAKLEY
CARLA B OAKLEY BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP1 MARKET PLZSPEAR ST TWRSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | hair accessories, namely, hair ornaments, hair ribbons, hair bands and hair nets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DEBORAH KOONS GARCIA AND DAVID M. HELLMAN, both U.S. citizens, as co-executrice and co-executor of the ESTATE OF JEROME J. GARCIA
- Other trademarks owned by Garcia, Jerome J.
- Other trademarks owned by DEBORAH KOONS GARCIA AND DAVID M. HELLMAN, both U.S. citizens, as co-executrice and co-executor of the ESTATE OF JEROME J. GARCIA
- Other trademarks in Class 026
- Similar marks named J. GARCIA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 6, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |