Drawing for @XPO

USPTO serial 74667765

@XPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEEGARS, GERALD C.
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with @XPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew P. Bridges

ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, and manuals sold as a unit, comprising databases containing information regarding products, trade shows, conferences, educational exhibits or demonstrations, all in the fields of computing, office equipment, communications, robotics, factory automation, artificial intelligence or other high technology industriesACTIVE—
038electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; audio and video broadcasting of conferences, seminars and educational events; telecommunications services, namely, audio and video teleconferencingACTIVE—
041educational and entertainment services, namely, conducting conferences, educational exhibits or demonstrations, all in the fields of computing, computer or high technology products, office equipment, communications, robotics, factory automation, artificial intelligence or other high technology industriesACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, providing access to an on-line computer database containing information regarding products, trade shows, conferences, educational exhibits or demonstrations, all in the fields of computing, office equipment, communications, robotics, factory automation, artificial intelligence or other high technology industriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 4, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 13, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 20, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 18, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 23, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 24, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 1, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance