USPTO serial 74668798
MIGHTY MACHINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVY, MICHAEL S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIGHTY MACHINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William B. Vass
WILLIAM B VASS RIDOUT & MAYBEE1 QUEEN ST E STE 2400TORONTO, ON M5C 3B1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | children's books, colouring books, children's activity books, crayons, paper place mats, and plastic place mats | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | bowls, cups, insulated beverage containers, lunch boxes, mugs, and plates | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | children's clothing and accessories, namely, pants, shorts, shirts, sweaters, jackets, jump suits, overalls, pyjamas, rainwear, robes, ski suits, snowsuits, swimwear | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | board games for children | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MALOFILM PRODUCTION INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MIGHTY MACHINES
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |