USPTO serial 74669481
CGR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENBERG, DEBORAH R.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CGR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J RECKAMP
CHRISTOPHER J RECKAMP GREER BURNS & CRAIN LTDSTE 8660 SEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | interactive entertainment and informational services, namely, providing information including on-line articles, relating to the fields of computer, video and other amusement games, providing on-line access to amusement games and providing interactive communication for on-line users which may be accessed network-wide by network users | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | interactive entertainment and informational services, namely, providing access to a database containing information including on-line articles, relating to the fields of computer, video and other amusement games, providing on-line access to amusement games and interactive communication for on-line users | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |