USPTO serial 74670340
HOUSE BLOCKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOUSE BLOCKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FLOYD E. IVEY
FLOYD E IVEY LIEBLER, IVEY & CONNOR, PSPOST OFFICE BOX 6125KENNEWICK, WA 99336UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | architectural design services featuring building, planning, and construction designing for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 20, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |