USPTO serial 74670350
PROTECTAZEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROTECTAZEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Province of Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICIA A CIGELNIK
PATRICIA A CIGELNIK DVORAK & TRAUB53 W JACKSON BLVDCHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceutical preparations for the prevention and treament of cardiac conditions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |