Drawing for PEREGRINE VENTURES

USPTO serial 74671486

PEREGRINE VENTURES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEREGRINE VENTURES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Perry J. Viscounty

PERRY J VISCOUNTY SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON4695 MACARTHUR COURT SEVENTH FLNEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-1862UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036venture capital investment and management servicesABANDONEDSep 30, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 29, 1999PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
Sep 3, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 11, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance