USPTO serial 74671526
WEAPON SHOPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZERVAS, ALBERT JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEAPON SHOPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James H. Walters
JAMES H WALTERS DELLETT AND WALTERS310 S W FOURTH AVESTE 1101PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | side arms and implements of self-defense | ABANDONED | — |
| 013 | automatic and semi-automatic weapons | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | retail and mail order services providing equipment and skills training for personal protection and/or sport, namely, equipment and skills training related to mental preparedness, extreme sports, wilderness and urban survival, self-defense and martial arts | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | retail stores and mail order services featuring exotic sporting goods and survival/self-defense items in the nature of night-vision equipment; military surplus camping gear; body armor; bullet-proof vests; military-style camouflage and concealment clothing; binoculars, to include electronic image-stabilized optics; telescopes personal alarm equipment; military radios; walkie talkies, to include models featuring high security digital encryption; laser range-finders; art prints featuring military themes; army surplus steel storage containers; global satellite positioning receivers; mobile infrared covert illuminators, to include both powerful search-sight and smaller flashlight-sized units; signal flares; video surveillance and security cameras, monitors, and recorders; telephone line tap detectors; military insignia patches for collectors; military-style wrist watches; battery-free dynamo-powered survival radios; replica middle ages renaissance clothing and memorabilia; combat-simulation board games and video games; videotapes; books and the like | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lamont, Michael
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 013
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named WEAPON SHOPS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |