USPTO serial 74671639
LEARNING LOFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEARNING LOFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Carrollton, GA
Carrollton, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H. Fails
CHARLES H FAILS ISAF VAUGHAN & KERRP O BOX 725388ATLANTA, GA 31139-9388UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | modular metallic structure; used as a wheelchair accessible activity and learning center for children | ABANDONED | Nov 20, 1995 |
| 016 | drawing boards | ABANDONED | Nov 20, 1995 |
| 020 | non-metal bookcases, non-metal storage bins, modular seating and non-metal ladders | ABANDONED | Nov 20, 1995 |
| 028 | toys, namely magnetic activity boards and interactive teaching materials in the form of memory learning games | ABANDONED | Nov 20, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Derbecker, Ray
- Other trademarks owned by Derbecker, Ray
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LEARNING LOFT
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |