USPTO serial 74672973
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | newsletter relating public relations and interactive technologies for the public relations professional | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |