Drawing for CLUBPAGE

USPTO serial 74673015

CLUBPAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLUBPAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIE A LAVALLEYE

MARIE A LAVALLEYE TUCKER FLYER & LEWIS PC1615 L ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009paging devices, namely, radio pagersABANDONED—
042wholesale distributorship, retail store services and on-site retailing featuring radio pagers, and leasing of radio pagersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 4, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 5, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 19971.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 14, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1997PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 21, 1997ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 1996PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance