USPTO serial 74673773
ALTOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK QUALITY REVIEW
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALTOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. HUGHES
MICHAEL J HUGHES OFFICE OF MICHAEL J HUGHESTHE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW1171 HOMESTEAD RD STE 295SANTA CLARA, CA 95050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely shells, jackets, rainwear, cardigans, vests, sweaters, pullovers, shirts, slacks, shorts and upper body wear consisting of wind resistant suits, all particularly designed for use by golfers | ABANDONED | Nov 10, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 26, 1998 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jun 23, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |