USPTO serial 74674192
THE CAMPAIGN PALACE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CAMPAIGN PALACE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BLACKBOOK NOMINEES (SYDNEY) PTY LIMITED
Kings Cross, 2011, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by BLACKBOOK NOMINEES (SYDNEY) PTY LIMITED
BLACKBOOK NOMINEES (SYDNEY) PTY LIMITED
Kings Cross, 2011, NSW, AU
Other trademarks owned by BLACKBOOK NOMINEES (SYDNEY) PTY LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesse Rothstein
JESSE ROTHSTEIN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising agency services, namely, facilitating placement of advertising in all media, namely, television, radio, newspaper, print, magazine, outdoor and on-line and consultation in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BLACKBOOK NOMINEES (SYDNEY) PTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BLACKBOOK NOMINEES (SYDNEY) PTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named THE CAMPAIGN PALACE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 27, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |