USPTO serial 74674599
VDR VIRTUAL-TOOLBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VDR VIRTUAL-TOOLBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mammoth Lakes, CA
Mammoth Lakes, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BETH M. GOLDMAN
BETH M GOLDMAN HELLER, EHRMAN, WHITE & MCAULIFFE525 UNIVERSITY AVEPALO ALTO, CA 94301-1900UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded electronic media, namely, computer software, CD ROMs, video cassettes and audio cassettes containing information and databases for problem solving, namely, dispute resolution, bill collection, contract negotiations, negotiations of new or existing agreements, comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of choosing a particular problem solving option and criteria by which consumers can craft their own problem solving strategies in the areas of business, construction, consumer affairs, education, employment, family relations, law, public policy and real estate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 9, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 15, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 13, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |