USPTO serial 74675704
FLYING TIGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLYING TIGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN J. JEFFRIES
STEPHEN J JEFFRIES HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | computer game cartridges, computer game cassettes, computer game discs, computer game programs, computer game software, board games; toy figurines, action figures and accessories therefore; toy trucks; toy airplanes; model airplane kits comprised of all parts necessary for assembly of a scale model airplane, decals for affixation thereto and printed model assembley instructions sold as a unit; jigsaw and manipulative puzzles; kites; water guns; two way radio toys; balloons; party favors in the nature of small toys; ride-ons; inline skates, skateboards and ice skates; and Christmas tree ornaments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |