Drawing for THE TURTLE PLUS

USPTO serial 74677892

THE TURTLE PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE TURTLE PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAURIE A. PEARD

LAURIE A PEARD MASUDA, FUNAI, EIFERT & MITCHELLONE E WACKER DRSTE 3200CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009vacuum cleaners, namely vacuum and deep cleaners for carpets, stairs, and upholsteryABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 1996ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 28, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 23, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance