USPTO serial 74678120
BEHAVIORAL TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEHAVIORAL TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard C. Dunavant, Jr.
LEONARD C DUNAVANT JR EVANS & PETREE81 MONROE AVEMEMPHIS, TN 38103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs in the field of employment interviewing and evaluation techniques, and instruction manuals sold therewith | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed instructional and teaching materials used in the process of performance reviews | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely conducting seminars relating to selection interviewing and performance evaluation techniques | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 1996 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |