USPTO serial 74679647
BIG GUN PROJECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIG GUN PROJECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert Steinberg
ROBERT STEINBERG IRELL & MANELLA1800 AVE OF THE STARS, STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD-roms, optical discs, compact discs, computer application software and multimedia discs, laser discs, digital tapes, audio and video tapes, and phonograph records all featuring comedy, drama, animation, news, documentaries, and music | ABANDONED | Jul 12, 1996 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line magazines by computer featuring comedy, drama, animation, news, documentaries, and music | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 22, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |