USPTO serial 74679950
VIRTUAL MALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIRTUAL MALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Koval, Jr.
WILLIAM J KOVAL JR ROETZEL & ANDRESS75 E MARKET STAKRON, OH 44308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | computer network on-line marketing service for businesses, non-profit organizations, charities and individuals, allowing said subscribers to sell, market, and/or provide information to the network users about their goods and services and to collect information from and about the network users so as to compile user surveys, order information, demographics and statistics for use by subscriber businesses, organizations, charities and individuals | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | computer network on-line marketing service for businesses, non-profit organizations, charities and individuals, allowing said subscribers to sell, market, and/or provide information to the network users about their goods and services and to collect information from and about the network users so as to compile user surveys, order information, demographics and statistics for use by subscriber businesses, organizations, charities and individuals | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |