USPTO serial 74680922
CUSTOM KID NAARTJIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TUCCILLO, SUSANA M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CUSTOM KID NAARTJIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cape Town, Western Cape, ZA
Cape Town, Western Cape, ZA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW V GALWAY
ANDREW V GALWAY LIDDY SULLIVAN GALWAY BEGLER & COHEN708 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | bed covers in the nature of bed spreads, blankets, quilts, duvet covers and sheets; pillow cases; table covers in the nature of table cloths not made of paper; table mats and table runners not made of paper; textiles, namely, textile linings for garments, textile napkins for removing make up, textile place mats, textile wall hangings, textile napkins, and tapestries of textile; bath linen in the nature of fabric bath mats and towels; curtains and curtain fabrics; and upholstery fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 7, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |