Drawing for RPM ROOT PRODUCTION METHOD

USPTO serial 74682940

RPM ROOT PRODUCTION METHOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RPM ROOT PRODUCTION METHOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. LEE GERDELMAN

M LEE GERDELMAN POLSTER, LIEDER, WOODRUFF & LUCCHESI763 S NEW BALLAS RDSTE 160ST LOUIS, MO 63141

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031live plants, trees, and shrubsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 18, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 17, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 24, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 26, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 19, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 26, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance