Drawing for KROLEWSKA

USPTO serial 74683373

KROLEWSKA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEETZOW, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KROLEWSKA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANITA H. GROSZ

ANITA H GROSZP O BOX 187SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033distilled liquorABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 31, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 23, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance