Drawing for TARK THE SHARK

USPTO serial 74683608

TARK THE SHARK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TARK THE SHARK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Miller

MARK D MILLER KIMBLE, MACMICHAEL & UPTON5260 N PALM AVESTE 221FRESNO, CA 93704

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016stationery, posters, postcards, pens, pencils, bumper stickers, trading cards, unmounted photographs, pencil erasers, calendars, stationery folders, book covers, playing cards, greeting cards, paper flags, food wrappers; and books, magazines and newspapers all on the subject of mens college basketballACTIVE—
021cups, coasters not of paper or cloth; beverage glass ware, plates, insulated cupsACTIVE—
024towels, cloth flags, and cloth pennantsACTIVE—
025shirts, sweaters, T-shirts, suits ties, caps, shorts, swimwear, tank tops, sweatshirts, sweatpants, visors, shoes, jackets, gloves, pants, underwear, socks, belts, bootsACTIVE—
041sports entertainment services in the nature of college basketball gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 28, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance