USPTO serial 74685774
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
St. Peters NSW 2044, AU
St. Peters NSW 2044, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rakeffet Carmon
RAKEFFET CARMON CARMON & CARMON767 THIRD AVE24TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017-0203| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | girls wear, namely, party dresses, sun-dresses, skirts, shorts, leggings, tops, shirts, pants, track-pants, track-tops, vests and T-shirts in both knits and wovens; boys wear, namely, T-shirts, shorts, jackets, pants and shirts in both knits and wovens | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 29, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |