USPTO serial 74686060
COMP SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 1999
- Examiner
- MICHOS, LESLIE BISHOP
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with COMP SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
HARTFORD, CT
Hartford Life Insurance Company
Hartford, CT
Hartford Life Insurance Company
Hartford, CT
Hartford Life Insurance Company
Hartford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cedric DeLaCruz
Cedric DeLaCruz The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.One Hartford PlazaHartford, CT 06155UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | administration of benefit plans for workers' compensation claims | ACTIVE | Mar 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Hartford Life Insurance Company
- Other trademarks owned by Hartford Life Insurance Company
- Other trademarks owned by Hartford Life Insurance Company
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named COMP SOLUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2019 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 1, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 26, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 22, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 30, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 27, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |