Drawing for EGYPT

USPTO serial 74686509

EGYPT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EGYPT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD G. WIERZBICKI

EDWARD G WIERZBICKI PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD& GERALDSON311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041amusement park services, namely an area within an amusement parkACTIVEMay 25, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 17, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 17, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 9, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 30, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 12, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 6, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 8, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 1996IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Aug 14, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 1996AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 13, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance