Drawing for TELECAR

USPTO serial 74686796

TELECAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIFMAN, ARI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TELECAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MATTHEW F. JODZIEWICZ

MATTHEW F LODZIEWICZ ALLIANCE RESEARCH CORPORATION INC9410 OWENMOUTH AVEP O BOX 4029CHATSWORTH, CA 91313

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009devices for connecting wireless instruments such as cellular telephones to computer networks, namely batteries, hands free speaker phone kits consisting of docking stations which serve as mounts and electric chargers for cellular telephones, electronic cabling, antennas, microphones, and audio speakers; starter kits consisting of batteries, electric power cords, battery savers, namely electric chargers for cellular phones, and carrying cases; power cords; battery savers, namely electric chargers for cellular phones; carrying cases for cellular phones; antennas; signal boosters, namely sound amplifiers; mounts, namely electric chargers for cellular phones; cradles, namely electric chargers for cellular phones; microphones; audio speakers, electrical cables; electrical connectors; computer hardware, namely automotive bus interface units allowing cellular phones to receive data transmitted; battery chargers; wireless network data interface units for interfacing a modem or a facsimile to a wireless network access device; geopositional location units, namely a satellite processor which receives a signal to a satellite, which in turn informs a user of his location; panic triggers, namely electronic controls for triggering an alarmABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 18, 1998ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 18, 1998OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 18, 1998OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Aug 22, 1996OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 15, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 17, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance