Drawing for Serial No. 74687512

USPTO serial 74687512

Serial No. 74687512

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74687512?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie Bertagnolli

LESLIE BERTAGNOLLI BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DRCHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030fruit juice concentrates, food flavorings and concentrates for baking, beverages, ice cream, fruit preserves, jams, marmalades and confectionery, food colors for domestic use and aromatic for food, fruit peels, citrus sherbet, citrus purees, citrus pulp, citrus flavedo, citrus novelty bar base, whole ground citrus fruits, frozen shaved citrus fruit peel, shredded citrus fruit peel, diced citrus fruit peel, orange marmalade baseABANDONEDJul 15, 1959

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 1996ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 4, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 31, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance