USPTO serial 74687651
DOCK C.O.P. CONSTANT ON-BOARD PROTECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOCK C.O.P. CONSTANT ON-BOARD PROTECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES G MERSEREAU
CHARLES G MERSEREAU HAUGEN AND NIKOLAI PA820 INTERNATIONAL CTR900 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3325Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | anti-tampering intrusion indicators and alarms for marine vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Traxler, Sharon
- Other trademarks owned by Traxler, Sharon
- Other trademarks owned by Traxler, Norbert
- Other trademarks owned by Traxler, Norbert
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DOCK C.O.P. CONSTANT ON-BOARD PROTECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1997 | EX1M | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | EX1D | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Aug 12, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |